Documents from the SIAIP Commissions

Issue 1 - 2025

Allergy skin tests: an update on Skin Prick Test and Prick to Prick

Authors

Key words: Skin prick test, prick by prick, Prick to prick test, Allergy diagnosis, IgE-mediated hypersensitivity, Food allergy testing, Aeroallergens and skin testing, Allergen extracts and standardization, Diagnostic accuracy in allergy testing, Automated Skin Prick Test
Publication Date: 2025-03-27

Abstract

Skin prick testing (SPT) is an essential tool in allergy diagnostics, allowing the identification of IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reactions to specific foods or environmental allergens. Among its variations, the prick by prick (PTP) test plays a crucial role in food allergy diagnosis, particularly when commercial allergen extracts fail to capture heat-sensitive or enzymatically labile proteins. PTP testing involves pricking a fresh food sample before introducing the allergen into the skin, thus ensuring exposure to the full allergenic profile. This method enhances diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, reducing the likelihood of false-negative results. The choice of SPT devices, whether single-prick or multiple-prick, significantly impacts test accuracy, reproducibility, and patient comfort. While single-prick devices offer precise allergen application, multiple-prick devices improve efficiency in clinical settings. Despite its advantages, PTP testing lacks standardization, with results influenced by food properties, regional variations, and test administration techniques. Additionally, PTP is a cost-effective alternative in areas where commercial extracts are unavailable. When combined with serum-specific IgE testing and oral food challenges, PTP enhances clinical decision-making, minimizing unnecessary dietary restrictions. This review provides an update on SPT and PTP methodologies, highlighting their strengths, limitations, and future perspectives in allergy diagnostics. Standardization and improved training protocols remain key to optimizing the reliability of these essential tests.

References

  1. Bousquet J, Heinzerling L, Bachert C, et al. Practical guide to skin prick tests in allergy to aeroallergens. Allergy 2012;67:18-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2011.02728.x.
  2. Ansotegui IJ, Melioli G, Canonica GW, et al. IgE allergy diagnostics and other relevant tests in allergy. World Allergy Organ J 2020;13:100080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.waojou.2019.100080.
  3. Popov TA, Passalacqua G, González-Díaz SN, et al. Medical devices in allergy practice. World Allergy Organ J 2020;13:100466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.waojou.2020.100466.
  4. Gupta N, Agarwal P, Sachdev A, et al. Allergy Testing — An Overview. Indian Pediatr. 2019;56:951-957.
  5. Heinzerling L, Mari A, Bergmann KC, et al. The skin prick test - European standards. Clin Transl Allergy 2013;3:1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/2045-7022-3-3.
  6. Zemmer F, Cenk E, Dahl Å, et al. A multidisciplinary approach of outdoor aeroallergen selection for Skin Prick Testing in the geographical area of Greater Istanbul. Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol 2022;54:34-42. https://doi.org/10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.188.
  7. Heinzerling LM, Burbach GJ, Edenharter G, et al. GA(2)LEN skin test study I: GA(2)LEN harmonization of skin prick testing: novel sensitization patterns for inhalant allergens in Europe. Allergy 2009;64:1498-1506. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.02093.x.
  8. Riggioni C, Ricci C, Moya B, et al. Systematic review and meta-analyses on the accuracy of diagnostic tests for IgE-mediated food allergy. Allergy 2024;79:324-352. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.15939.
  9. Stingeni L, Bianchi L, Tramontana M, et al. Skin tests in the diagnosis of adverse drug reactions. G Ital Dermatol Venereol 2020;155:602-621. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0392-0488.20.06698-5.
  10. Klimek L, Hoffmann HJ, Kalpaklioglu AF, et al. In-vivo diagnostic test allergens in Europe: A call to action and proposal for recovery plan—An EAACI position paper. Allergy 2020;75:2161-2169. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.14329.
  11. Cardona V, Demoly P, Dreborg S, et al. Current practice of allergy diagnosis and the potential impact of regulation in Europe. Allergy 2018;73:323-327. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.13306.
  12. Klimek L, Hans Jürgen H, Kugler A, et al. Impact of changed legislation on skin tests: the present and future. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2016;16:465-468. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACI.0000000000000312.
  13. Terlouw S, van Boven FE, Borsboom-Van Zonneveld M, et al. Homemade Food Allergen Extracts for Use in Skin Prick Tests in the Diagnosis of IgE-Mediated Food Allergy: A Good Alternative in the Absence of Commercially Available Extracts? Nutr 2022;14:475. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14030475
  14. Jost R, Kespohl S, Paulus-Tremel KE, et al. Possible manufacture of test allergens in public pharmacies for the diagnosis of type I allergies: Legal aspects. Allergol Sel 2024;8:251-264. https://doi.org/10.5414/ALX02514E.
  15. Kespohl S, Jost R, Maryska S, et al. Procedure for a standardized preparation of skin prick test solutions for the diagnosis of occupational type I allergies in the absence of commercial extracts. Allergol Sel 2024;8:238-250. https://doi.org/10.5414/ALX02506E.
  16. Muthupalaniappen L, Jamil A. Prick, patch or blood test? A simple guide to allergy testing. Malaysian Fam physician Off J Acad Fam Physicians Malaysia 2021;16:19-26. https://doi.org/10.51866/rv1141.
  17. Treudler R, Simon JC. Update on Type-1 Allergy Diagnostics. Handb Exp Pharmacol 2022;268:393-403. https://doi.org/10.1007/164_2021_487.
  18. Fatteh S, Rekkerth DJ, Hadley JA. Skin prick/puncture testing in North America: a call for standards and consistency. Allergy, Asthma Clin Immunol 2014;10:1-9.
  19. Yoon IK, Martin BL, Carr WW. A comparison of two single-headed and two multi-headed allergen skin test devices. Allergy asthma Proc 2006;27:473-478. https://doi.org/10.2500/aap.2006.27.2937.
  20. Dykewicz MS, Dooms KT, Chassaing DL. Comparison of the Multi-Test II and ComforTen allergy skin test devices. Allergy asthma Proc 2011;32:198-202. https://doi.org/10.2500/aap.2011.32.3441.
  21. Carr WW, Martin B, Howard RS, et al. Comparison of test devices for skin prick testing. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2005;116:341-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2005.03.035.
  22. Ateş A, Kınıklı G, Turgay M, et al. The results of skin prick testing in patients with allergic rhinitis: a comparison between a multiple lancet device and a single lancet. Asian Pacific J Allergy Immunol 2004;22:109-114.
  23. Ménardo JL, Bousquet J, Rodière M, et al. Skin test reactivity in infancy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1985;75:646-651. https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-6749(85)90088-0.
  24. Martinez FD. The connection between early life wheezing and subsequent asthma: The viral march. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 2009;37:249-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aller.2009.06.008.
  25. Frati F, Incorvaia C, Cavaliere C, et al. The skin prick test. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents 2018;32(1 Suppl 1):19-24.
  26. Patel G, Saltoun C. Skin testing in allergy. Allergy asthma Proc 2019;406:366-368. https://doi.org/10.2500/aap.2019.40.4248.
  27. Seys SF, Roux K, Claes C, et al. Skin Prick Automated Test device offers more reliable allergy test results compared to a manual skin prick test. Rhinology 2024;62:216-222. https://doi.org/10.4193/Rhin23.330.
  28. Justo X, Díaz I, Gil JJ, et al. Prick test: evolution towards automated reading. Allergy 2016;71:1095-1102. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.12921.
  29. Gorris S, Uyttebroek S, Backaert W, et al. Reduced intra-subject variability of an automated skin prick test device compared to a manual test. Allergy. 2023;78:1366-1368. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.15619.
  30. Seys SF, Gorris S, Uyttebroek S, et al. Evaluation of skin prick location on the forearm using a novel skin prick automated test device. Front allergy 2023;4:1289031. https://doi.org/10.3389/falgy.2023.1289031.
  31. Sirin Kose S, Asilsoy S, Uzuner N, et al. Outcomes of Baked Milk and Egg Challenge in Cow’s Milk and Hen’s Egg Allergy: Can Tolerance Be Predicted with Allergen-Specific IgE and Prick-to-Prick Test? Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2019;180:264-273. https://doi.org/10.1159/000502957.
  32. Patti ML, De Rose C, Brancato F, et al. Sensitivity of prick test with walnut commercial extracts and of prick by prick with raw walnut compared with open food challenge in walnut allergy. Acta Biomed 2021;92(S1):e2021067. https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v92iS1.10043.
  33. Adomaite I, Stirbiene N, Marciukaitiene V, et al. Prick-by-Prick Test with Pasteurised Cow’s Milk: A Valuable Tool in Paediatric Practice. Biomed Res Int 2022;2022:9738654. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9738654.
  34. Terlouw S, van Boven FE, Borsboom-van Zonneveld M, et al. Comparison of skin prick test and prick-to-prick test with fruits and vegetables in the diagnosis of food allergy. Clin Transl Allergy 2024;14:e12375. https://doi.org/10.1002/clt2.12375.
  35. Vlieg-Boerstra BJ, Van De Weg WE, Van Der Heide S, et al. Where to prick the apple for skin testing? Allergy 2013;68:1196-1198. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.12201.
  36. SIAIP Allergy Diagnostic Commission, edited by. Bernardini R, Arasi S, Barni S, et al. Multiparametric or multiplex systems in allergy diagnostics. Italian Journal of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology 2024;38:17-21. https://doi.org/10.53151/2531-3916/2024-436.
  37. Kowalski ML, Ansotegui I, Aberer W, et al. Risk and safety requirements for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in allergology: World Allergy Organization Statement. World Allergy Organ J 2016;9:33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40413-016-0122-3.
  38. Liccardi G, D’amato G, Canonica GW, et al. Systemic reactions from skin testing: literature review. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2006;16:75-78.
  39. Norrman G, Fälth-Magnusson K. Adverse reactions to skin prick testing in children – Prevalence and possible risk factors. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2009;20:273–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3038.2008.00761.x.
  40. Lockey RF, Benedict LM, Turkeltaub PC, et al. Fatalities from immunotherapy (IT) and skin testing (ST). J Allergy Clin Immunol 1987;79:660-677. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0091-6749(87)80164-1.
  41. Swender DA, Chernin LR, Mitchell C, et al. The rate of epinephrine administration associated with allergy skin testing in a suburban allergy practice from 1997 to 2010. Allergy Rhinol (Providence) 2012;3:ar.2012.3.0034. https://doi.org/10.2500/ar.2012.3.0034.

Downloads

Authors

Edited by SIAIP Diagnostic Commission

Giulio Dinardo - Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania ‘Luigi Vanvitelli’, Naples, Italy

Fernanda Chiera - Department of Pediatrics, Giovanni Paolo II Hospital, Lamezia Terme, ASP Catanzaro, Italy

Stefania Arasi - Area of Translational Research in Pediatric Specialities, Allergy Unit, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy

Arianna Giannetti - Pediatric Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy

Davide Caimmi - Allergy Unit, CHU de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; IDESP, UMR 1318, INSERM, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France

Carla Mastrorilli - Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital Consortium Corporation Polyclinic of Bari, Pediatric Hospital Giovanni XXIII, Bari, Italy

Luca Pecoraro - Pediatric Unit, Ospedale Vito Fazzi, ASL Lecce, Lecce, Italy

Serena Gracci - Pediatrics and Neonatology Unit, Maternal and Child Department, San Giuseppe Hospital, Empoli, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Italy

Michele Miraglia del Giudice - Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania ‘Luigi Vanvitelli’, Naples, Italy

Roberto Bernardini - Pediatrics and Neonatology Unit, Maternal and Child Department, San Giuseppe Hospital, Empoli, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Italy

How to Cite
Diagnostic Commission, E. by S., Dinardo, G., Chiera, F. ., Arasi, S., Giannetti, A., Caimmi, D., Mastrorilli, C., Pecoraro, L., Gracci, S., Miraglia del Giudice, M., & Bernardini, R. (2025). Allergy skin tests: an update on Skin Prick Test and Prick to Prick. Italian Journal of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, 39(1). https://doi.org/10.53151/2531-3916/2025-1109
  • Abstract viewed - 55 times
  • pdf downloaded - 10 times